Navigating the Fast-track Approvals Act 2024

After a contentious journey through the Parliament, the Fast Track Approvals Act 2024 is here and as of 7 February 2024, the Fast track approval process is open to anyone who wants to apply for expedited consents of qualifying projects. Here’s how we can help.

 

Legislative overview

The Fast-track Approvals Act 2024 (the Act) came into effect in December 2024 and aims to achieve a more efficient consenting process for infrastructure and development projects that will bring significant regional or national benefit.

The Act initially listed 149 projects for which consent applications could be made directly to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA), the expert panel tasked with considering each application. These projects span across various sectors including housing and land development (58), infrastructure (43), renewable energy (22), Mining (11), aquaculture and farming (7) and quarrying (8). A total of 19 of these projects are based in the Waikato.[1]

While the Act aims to simplify regulatory approvals, it does not remove the need to engage with Māori rights and interests. These projects inherently concern te taiao / the natural environment we live in. Māori have unique rights and relationships with their tribal areas. It’s important that this reality plays an integral part when pursuing a project.

Why tikanga matters

Throughout the Act are sections relating to the Treaty of Waitangi. In particular, the Act addresses:

  • Existing Treaty settlements;
  • Customary rights recognised under the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011;
  • Te Ture Whaimana, which governs activities affecting the Waikato and Waipā Rivers.

A failure to address these requirements can lead to delays, disputes, or an application being declined. Having expert tikanga advice from the outset ensures that cultural obligations are not just met but effectively integrated into the process, strengthening the overall process and relationships between people on the ground.

How we can assist you

Our team offers expert guidance on:

  • Engaging authentically and respectfully with all parties
  • Upholding kaitiatkitanga and sustainable development practices
  • Fostering a deeper understanding of all communities and connection to land
  • Developing projects that uplift and support all communities while protecting cultural site and taonga.

Strategic tikanga support for Fast-track success

For projects involving Māori land under section 23 of the Act, the Minister has discretion to determine whether certain infrastructure projects can proceed. Before making a decision, the Minister must assess the impact on Māori landowners and their rights. Our teams expertise in whenua Māori is well versed to ensure that any application addresses these concerns proactively. Further, under section 18 of the Act, a Treaty settlement report is required to assess the impact of a project on Māori rights and interests. Our team can assist with engagement and adherence to Treaty obligations.

A successful fast-track application requires more than just meeting regulatory requirements, it requires tikanga integration. We provide tailored advice to assess and ensure any fast-track project aligns with the necessary obligations.

Whether you’re an iwi group, fast track applicant, or third party with an interest in a fast-track project, contact our Resource Management experts as part of our Kahurangi Whenua Team to see how we can assist.

My Ex Lives in the Family Home – Should They Pay Occupational Rent?

When a relationship breaks down, it is common for one party to remain in the family home while the other pays for accommodation elsewhere.  This situation can raise concerns of fairness if one party is able to continue to enjoy the use of the home.  In this article, we explore the concept of “occupational rent” and how it can help separating couples reach a fair outcome.

What is Occupational Rent?

Occupational rent is essentially “market rent” paid by the party continuing to live in the family home to compensate the party who moves out and pays for alternative accommodation.  Depending on the amicability of the separation, this arrangement can last for months (or even years) until issues regarding ownership are finalised.

How is Occupational Rent Calculated?

The standard calculation is 50% of the market rent.  For example, if the market rent for the family home is $700 per week, the party who moved out will be due $350 per week from the separation date to the date matters are settled.  Parties can agree amongst themselves an acceptable market rent value, or an expert may be called upon to determine the appropriate market rent.

But I’ve Been Paying the Mortgage

In practice, occupational rent is often used as an offset to balance claims for other costs or post-separation contributions.  Occupational rent is often offset against the mortgage, rates and insurance of the family home to ensure each party’s post-separation contributions are compensated fairly.  It can even be used to counter spousal maintenance payments.

Is Occupational Rent a Certainty?

Whether to order a payment of occupational rent is entirely at the Court’s discretion.  It is not a guarantee and cannot be relied on.  The Court sometimes takes a “broadbrush approach”, meaning that every set of circumstances is assessed on its own merit.  The Court uses its power under the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 to consider whether an order is just, considering factors including the financial impact an order would cause to either party and the interests of any children.

Knowing your rights and obligations following a separation can be difficult.  The experienced team at McCaw Lewis can help you navigate relationship property matters or answer any questions you may have.

Chantelle is an Associate in our Dispute Resolution Team.

Chantelle can be contacted on 07 958 7473 or chantelle.holland@mccawlewis.co.nz

Things you need to know about social media posts and employment

Social media has become a big part of most people’s daily routine, and as a result, many aspects of our lives can be found easily online.  When it comes to differentiating between our personal and professional lives, the line is sometimes hard to find.

And in an employment situation, questions can arise over what an employee does in their personal life and how that can be dealt with in the workplace.  Is there anything that an employer can do about an employee’s personal social media posts?

Employee behaviour outside the workplace

Generally, an employee can be disciplined or even dismissed for misconduct that occurs outside of the workplace.

This is not a free for all and there does need to be some link between the employee’s conduct and their employment.  For example, this can be the case where an individual is well known in a professional setting and does something that has the potential to bring their employer into disrepute by association.

So, what’s the deal with social media activity of employees?

It goes without saying that anyone using a work profile or operating a company account has to “play by the rules” around social media.  Equally, if an employee is expressly posting about work topics, in work uniform or on work premises, the employee will be open to disciplinary action if the posts are inappropriate or in breach of employer rules.

But when using a personal social media account – what then?

In short, this needs to be dealt with on a case by case basis, considering all the circumstances.  Key considerations that need to be weighed up when addressing social media posts by employees include:

  • Are the social media posts clearly made by an employee? It is not sufficient for an employee to use an alternative name or image effect if it can still be traced back to them, and in turn the employer.
  • What does the social media post say? This will mean looking at the specific wording but also considering whether there are other clear inferences that can be taken from the strict wording in the circumstances, given the topic or other surrounding comments.
  • Who is able to see the post? Even comments made on private accounts to an employee’s friends may still be misconduct.
  • Check the relevant policies. There will often be employer policies which deal with social media specifically, and these do need to be followed.  There might also be general code of conduct provisions relevant to the situation.
  • Are there any other industry requirements or obligations that might apply? For example, there may be specific privacy rules at play or industry requirements around confidentiality.
  • How might the content of the posts, or the action itself, fit with the employer’s values? At times, the content of posts, or even the fact of making any comment on a particular topic, will be at odds with the values or core functions of the employer.  This may be the case where an employer is performing a public function or providing services of a nature that require certain public confidence.
  • Do the posts have the potential to bring the employer into disrepute? Employees should recognise that social media posts can reach people right across the world, regardless of how and where they are posted.  They can be received in many ways as well.  Whether a post has the potential to bring an employer into disrepute will depend on the wider context.
  • Are the posts of a nature or content that destroys the employer’s relationship of trust and confidence with the employee?

While there is protection for free speech at an individual level, this does not enable or entitle employees to take steps or make statements that have the potential to adversely affect their employer.  When entering into an employment relationship, both parties have obligations of good faith to each other to ensure a productive working relationship.  Rude or inappropriate social media posts do not fit into that category.

For both employers and employees, it is important to understand employer policies and key values or expectations of employees.

  • For employees, always err on the side of caution. If it is that important for you to post something online, you can always read the policies and check with your employer first.
  • For employers looking to avoid this situation, ensure that your policies are up to date and well communicated to your team. If faced with this situation, the best approach is always to discuss matters with your employee before taking any further action.

Remember that posts on social media can last forever, regardless of whether they are deleted and who you share them with.  Care and caution should always be exercised.

For further information or advice on matters, or to update your social media policies, contact Executive Director, Renika Siciliano, or any of our Workplace Law Team at McCaw Lewis.

Contact us

HAMILTON OFFICE

P. 07 838 2079

E. reception@mccawlewis.co.nz

Level 6, 586 Victoria Street
Hamilton 3204
New Zealand

TE KŪITI OFFICE

P. 07 878 8036

E. reception@mccawlewis.co.nz

36 Taupiri Street
Te Kūiti 3910
New Zealand