Navigating the changing landscape: key proposals for Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 and Resource Management Act 1991 legislation

The Government has recently announced proposals to amend Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (TTWMA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA).  These proposals are aimed at narrowing the scope of the current system, its effects and controls, with the guiding principle to centre legislation around the enjoyment of property rights.  For TTWMA, a key reason for the proposed changes is to improve the efficiencies of the Māori Land Court and assist with a vast number of applications before the Court.

 

Resource Management Reforms

The Government intends to replace the RMA with two new pieces of legislation – The Planning Act – focuses on regulating use, development and enjoyment of land; and The Natural Environment Act – focuses on use, protection and enhancement of the natural environment.

The new legislation could remove the use of the current section 8 provision for decision-makers to take into account the principles of the Treaty/Te Tiriti with more of a focus shifting toward around recognising and upholding Treaty Settlements.  This is a significant change which could have extensive impact and effects on Māori and Te Ao Māori within the new framework.  While the legislation is yet to be introduced, now is a good time for relationship building between local council, iwi and hapū.  This can be as simple as having hui to open lines of communication and trust between parties.  You may share your concerns about the legislation and begin the kōrero of how this may practically affect your respective interests within your rohe.

 

Whenua Māori Reforms

The Government is also undertaking public consultation on proposed changes to TTWMA, to promote the development and retention of whenua Māori.  Feedback must be provided to Te Puni Kōkiri by Friday, 23 May 2025.  Further details and particulars around the proposed changes can be found here: Discussion document

The key proposed changes include:

  • Enabling a central register of whenua Māori owners/trustees
  • Enabling the Registrar of the Court to be able to file for a review of trust
  • Widening the scope of the Court in relation to appointed agents
  • Widening the powers of the Māori Land Court regarding amalgamated land
  • Enabling the Court to vest a freehold interest in General land in the beneficiary of a will or administrator of an estate
  • Extending the period for which a long-term lease can be granted without Court approval from 52 years to 99 years

Most of the proposed changes may assist in this way, particular thought should be given to proposed long-term lease arrangements and matters of appointed agents for whenua Māori where no governance structure is in place.  If you would like to hear more about the proposed changes, an online information session will be held on Thursday, 15 May.  The link for the May session is here: 15 May Online Session

 

While Te Puni Kōkiri have proposed a number of changes, they are also open to any feedback on how TTWMA can be improved.  Feedback on any of the proposed changes to TTWMA can be sent to either via email to ttwma@tpk.govt.nz or by physical copy to Te Puni Kōkiri National Office, 143 Lambton Quay, Wellington Central, Wellington, 6011.

 

Our whenua Māori and Taiao teams at McCaw Lewis are available to assist with a wide range of services within these spaces and are available for answering any pātai that you may have around these new changes and how they may affect you.

Tazmyn Prendiville-Stowers and Hakaraia Richards-Coxhead are in our Whenua and Taiao teams and can be contacted on:

Tazmyn: 07 958 7467

Hakaraia: 07 901 0712

Is Copyright Relationship Property?

On 6 March 2025, the Supreme Court in Alalääkkölä v Palmer [2025] NZSC 9 confirmed that copyright is relationship property, and effectively up for grabs.  The decision is the latest chapter in a dispute dating back to 2017 between Sirpa Alalääkkölä and Paul Palmer.

Alalääkkölä v Palmer has been widely discussed as having a potential impact on artists, creatives and intellectual property.  But as the dust settles, how might this actually affect you? We take you through the decision, and some practical matters to be aware of.

Background

Sirpa Alalääkkölä (Ms Alalääkkölä) and Paul Palmer (Mr Palmer) separated in 2017, after 20 years of marriage.  Ms Alalääkkölä, an accomplished artist, provided the main source of income for the family.  On separation, Ms Alalääkkölä agreed Mr Palmer could keep several artworks as relationship property.  Mr Palmer then sought to copyright, reproduce, and sell copies of those paintings, which Ms Alalääkkölä objected to, setting the scene for a multi-year dispute centred around copyright.  This novel legal dispute covered previously unexplored territory between copyright and relationship property.

Legal Issues

The issues for the Supreme Court to decide were:

  • Is copyright “property”, for the purposes of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PRA)?
  • If so, is copyright relationship property, or separate property, under the PRA?
  • How should the financial value derived from copyright be allocated under the PRA?

Implications

Who Owns Copyright in a Relationship?

  • The Copyright Act 1994 gives the author of a work a variety of rights, such as the right to reproduce, sell, and distribute copies. It also includes the ability to waive those rights.
  • The long-standing approach in New Zealand is that copyright is a form of personal property. However, copyright created during a marriage holds an economic value.  That economic value, according to Alalääkkölä v Palmer [2025] NZSC 9, is relationship property.
  • In short, while the owner of the copyright keeps the moral and personal rights of the copyright, the economic value derived from that copyright can be valued for the purposes of the PRA.
  • The Courts will also choose a division which respects the copyright owner’s right to disclose to the public as they please, where it is consistent with a just division of relationship property.

Valuing Copyright

After confirming copyright as relationship property under the PRA, the Court made subsequent directions for the Family Court to deal with valuing Ms Alalääkkölä’s work, under several categories:

  • incomplete, damaged or unsuitable;
  • intended to be kept private;
  • a unique piece;
  • a piece (or pieces) with multiple copies.

The Court also emphasised that a market valuation should reflect whether copyright for specific artwork has been monetised in the past, and whether the artist intends to exploit it in the future.

Conclusion

The distinction between a right to create, and the financial benefits that flow from that right, can be difficult to define.  However, that distinction can clearly become the subject of dispute, as shown by Alalääkkölä v Palmer [2025] NZSC 9.

Our team at McCaw Lewis regularly deal with intricacies in the relationship property space. They can provide you with the right support and assistance, starting from the commencement of discussions, through to complex legal Court proceedings.  If your situation requires legal guidance, please get in touch with us.

 

Zane Mora is an Associate in our Dispute Resolution Team and can be contacted on 07 958 7431.

Preventing employment relationship problems

Keeping a healthy and productive employment relationship between an employer and employee is an important part of working together for the betterment and benefit of the overall business.  It goes without saying that issues and problems can crop up from time to time, whether intentional or unintentional, the best way to prevent employment relationship problems is to stop issues before they start.

Employment agreements must contain a simple, plan language explanation of how to resolve employment relationship problems and often referred to as dispute resolution.  It should be written clearly so that everyone knows what steps they need to follow if they think or if there is a problem.

Recognising an issue early

An employment issue includes anything that harms or that may harm the employment relationship. There can be many employment relationships, for example between:

  • Employer and employee
  • Employees
  • Manager and employee.

It is important to think through the problem and gather all relevant information.  It is worth spending some time at this stage trying to identify the underlying cause in order to see how the problem might be resolved.  Generally, this would involve collecting the information is the first step in resolving an issue.  It is about being honest as missing out important facts or changing the facts can make the problem worse.

Before taking it up with an employer or employee, it might be a good idea to talk through a problem with another manager or HR department to clarify whether a problem exists and what the issues might be; the cause of a problem might not be obvious.  Always take care to respect the privacy of other and protect confidential information.

Some simple practices that can help make relationships smoother and prevent problems as an employee:

  • Take time to communicate clearly. Poor communication can often cause disputes and misunderstandings.
  • Raise concerns when they first appear can assist resolving them from becoming larger and/or harder to resolve.
  • Making sure you know and understand workplace policies and procedures.
  • Being prepared to engage in regular performance check-ins and stay updated on changes in the workplace.
  • Use the proper channels to report concerns like bullying, discrimination, or harassment.
  • Taking responsibility can help prevent and resolve misunderstandings, confusion or mistakes such as speaking up if you think there’s an error, like an overpayment.

On the other side, here are some simple practices that can help employers build smoother relationships and prevent problems:

  • Encourage employees to raise issues right away to avoid escalation.
  • Ensure workplace rules and procedures are easy to understand and well communicated, especially policies around resolving problems/concerns.
  • Implementing clear systems for setting performance expectations, holding regular check-ins, keeping staff informed, and managing changes or performance issues.
  • Having clear processes for addressing issues like bullying, discrimination, or harassment.
  • Foster shared responsibility and encourage a culture where everyone helps prevent and resolve mistakes, such as reporting errors like overpayment.
  • As long as you follow workplace policies, you can remain flexible and explore different ways to address concerns when considered separately, helping to resolve issues while acting in good faith.

 

Alternative resolution pathways

Both parties should first attempt to resolve issues between themselves to prevent escalation and maintain a positive working relationship.  If this informal approach does not work, mediation may be considered.  With both parties’ agreement, an independent mediator could help facilitate discussions, identify issues, and propose mutually beneficial solutions.  This service is free and provide by the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment.

 

If you are needing advice about what dispute resolution process and/or policies you currently have in place or have current issues that you wish to resolve in a proper and fair way, McCaw Lewis has an experienced workplace team who can assist you.

Cree Ratapu is a Senior Solicitor in our Workplace Law Team and can be contacted on 07 808 6069.

Contact us

HAMILTON OFFICE

P. 07 838 2079

E. reception@mccawlewis.co.nz

Level 6, 586 Victoria Street
Hamilton 3204
New Zealand

TE KŪITI OFFICE

P. 07 878 8036

E. reception@mccawlewis.co.nz

36 Taupiri Street
Te Kūiti 3910
New Zealand