Post-Settlement Governance Entity

Many iwi have concluded their Treaty of Waitangi settlements but a number are still in the process of doing so.  Establishment of a Post-Settlement Governance Entity (PSGE) is an integral step in the settlement journey and important for the future success of iwi claimant groups.

What is a Post-Settlement Governance Entity?

A PSGE is the entity that receives and manages the settlement assets on behalf of the iwi claimant group.  Establishing a PSGE is required for settlement; the Crown will not complete settlement until a PSGE is established and ratified by the claimant group.

Key Requirements

Although a PSGE is designed by an iwi group to suit the iwi and their wider context, the Crown must approve the final PSGE to ensure, from its perspective, that the settlement redress is going to be held for the right people and in a responsible way.  There is a set of key Crown requirements that a PSGE must satisfy. A PSGE must be:

  • Representative of the iwi/claimant group
  • Transparent in its decision-making and dispute resolution procedures
  • Accountable to the iwi/claimant group
  • For the benefit of the members of the iwi/claimant group
  • Ratified by the iwi/claimant group
Start Discussions Early

Generally the main focus during settlement negotiations is achieving an Agreement in Principle followed by a Deed of Settlement.  However, given the significance of the PSGE and the Crown process to approve and ratify the proposed PSGE, we advise that iwi should start discussions early during the negotiation process as to what would be the most suitable PSGE to represent iwi members post-settlement.

Early discussions about the PSGE are important for the following reasons:

  • Keeping iwi members informed so that they are part of shaping the PSGE to reflect their reality, and that iwi members understand and accept the proposed PSGE. Early involvement and hui with iwi members increases the likelihood that the claimant group will buy into, accept and ratify the final PSGE proposal.
  • Gaining Crown acceptance; practically this means working with the Crown at an early stage in the development of the PSGE. This is important in gaining the Crown’s final acceptance of the proposed PSGE. It also provides time to work through any bespoke arrangements to ensure the proposed PSGE model can be achieved.
PSGE Structures

The most common form of PSGE is a private trust that is governed by a trust deed.  The trustees are generally members of the claimant group, and the initial trustees will be appointed/elected at the same time the PSGE is established.  While a private trust is recommended as the PSGE itself, other potential structures will inevitably form part of the wider post settlement governance structure to hold commercial assets and/or manage charitable functions.Within the Crown framework, there is more than one way to structure a PSGE and it is not a ‘one-size fits all’ exercise.  Our team can assist iwi/claimant groups in working through a variety of issues pragmatically and in context, to ensure that a PSGE will best serve its members in the future.

Katia is a Senior Solicitor in our Commercial Team and can be contacted on 07 958 7443.

Business Debt Hibernation – Survival Following COVID-19

What do you do when a debtor company asks you for Business Debt Hibernation?  Business Debt Hibernation (BDH) allows companies affected by COVID-19 to put in place a one month voluntary arrangement whereby creditors are paid a percentage of outstanding debt, with the balance delayed. Under the new Schedule 13 of the Companies Act 1993, where debtors require further time, and if creditors agree, a further period of six months protection can be arranged.

Does your debtor company qualify?

A debtor company may apply for BDH if:

  • It was able to pay its debts as at 31 December 2019;
  • It has or is likely to have in the next six months significant cashflow problems, however will be able to pay its debts after that six month period (and by no later than 30 September 2021);
  • At least 80% of the directors pass a resolution for BDH for an initial one month period;
  • The directors who vote for BDH sign a certificate setting out the grounds as to how the company will be able to pay its debts within the prescribed timeframe;
  • The directors state they are acting in good faith.

Companies registered after 1 January 2020 and before 3 April 2020 are automatically excluded from applying for BDH.

What say do creditors have?

Before expiry of the initial one month period, creditors must vote as to whether BDH should continue for a further six months.  All company creditors should receive:

  • A copy of the proposed resolution for BDH for a further six months;
  • The proposed arrangement;
  • “How to vote” instructions;
  • Confirmation that the vote is binding.

For the vote, a “related creditor’s” vote cannot be taken into account.  After a successful vote, notice of the BDH extension will be registered with the Companies Office.  The six months starts from the date of registration.

The arrangement

An arrangement can:

  • Reduce the amount to be paid during BDH (however, creditors cannot alter debt interest rates);
  • Postpone payment dates;
  • Prevent the exercise of powers/restrain creditor rights during BDH.  For instance, it could be that a debtor company only pays 40 cents in the dollar during BDH, but the 60 cents in the dollar remains to be paid after BDH.

An arrangement cannot cancel, vary, or prevent the exercise of creditor rights at the end of the BDH.

During BDH, recovery options can be limited.  To ensure recovery, it is important to closely review the arrangement and decide whether the arrangement affords adequate protection.

Following BDH

BDH will end:

  • After the initial one month plus six months (seven months in total); or
  • Earlier if the directors agree.

The Court may order that a creditor is not bound by an arrangement if the arrangement approval process was flawed or is unfairly prejudicial to the creditor.  There are strict timeframes on challenging an arrangement in Court, so being proactive is essential.

On receipt of a BDH notice, reviewing the proposed arrangement is a useful first step in deciding whether further action is required.  If you are unhappy with the arrangement, Court action is available.

If you would like further information, please contact Daniel Shore on 07 958 7477.

Commercial Leases During COVID-19 – How Does Arbitration Work?

Commercial leases have been in the spotlight during COVID-19. With many tenants unable to operate from their premises during the Alert Level 4 (and 3 to a lesser extent), resulting in a loss of revenue, the Government has been encouraging landlords to negotiate with tenants. On 4 June 2020, the Government announced that small business commercial tenants and landlords who cannot reach agreement on a fair reduction in rent will enter into a subsidised, compulsory arbitration process.

Eligibility

The rent dispute process will be for businesses with 20 or fewer fulltime employees that can prove a loss of revenue as a result of COVID-19 disruption. The same 20 employees provision applies to landlords (in disputes about paying their own mortgage).

However, commercial tenants and landlords who have already reached agreement in response to COVID-19 will not be eligible.

Step 1: Negotiation

Good-faith negotiation (discussing over a coffee, meeting at the workplace or involving lawyers to advocate for you) is the preferred first step – the relationship is more likely to remain amicable and can result in lower legal costs for both parties. Many tenants and landlords have already been through this negotiation phase and reached an agreement. The Government guidelines also suggest this stage could include mediation; however, this will be up to the parties.

The landlord and tenant should try to negotiate a fair proportion of rent and outgoings which would not be payable by the tenant. A “fair proportion” will depend on the particular circumstances of the tenancy; our article “COVID-19 – What happens to my commercial lease?” discusses the relevant factors. It is important to enter negotiations in good-faith, and it helps if both parties take time to understand how the other side may be being impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The actual rent reduction can be implemented in several ways:

  • A rent-free period;
  • A reduced-rent period (including reductions of varying levels over successive periods);
  • A scheduled rent increase being deferred;
  • Continuing current rent; or
  • A combination of the above options.
Step 2: Arbitration

If the tenant and landlord cannot agree on a fair rent price, a temporary change to the Property Law Act will lead to a compulsory arbitration process, even if there is no existing agreement to arbitrate in the commercial lease. The arbitration will be subsidised up to around 75%. The Government has estimated the cost of each arbitration to be approximately $8,000, so the landlord and the tenant will need to make up the remaining $2,000.00 (approximate) shortfall.

What is arbitration?

Arbitration is a way to resolve disputes other than through the public Court system. An independent and impartial Arbitrator will consider the merits of both parties’ cases and decide the outcome. The Arbitrator’s decision is called an “award” and is final and binding, subject to a limited right to challenge/appeal the award of the Arbitrator. One of the benefits of an arbitration is not having to wait for a Court date in the public Court system, which in some cases can take up to two years. By contrast a typical arbitration can usually be dealt with over a period of several months.

While we are still waiting on details on how the “compulsory” element will work, in general parties can agree on an Arbitrator or one can be appointed by a professional body such as the New Zealand Law Society or the Arbitrators’ and Mediators’ Institute of New Zealand. It is usual for a person to be appointed as the Arbitrator who has experience in commercial property/lease disputes.

How does arbitration work?

Although the details are yet to be provided, the Arbitration Act 1996 is likely to apply. Under the Arbitration Act, a formal arbitration agreement is usually drawn up and signed off by the parties and Arbitrator. Pre-hearing conferences may also be held between the Arbitrator and the parties. One of the common provisions in an arbitration is that there is no right of appeal from the Arbitrator’s decision except on questions of law. The parties to the arbitration can agree to waive (i.e. forego) the right to appeal. It is not possible to appeal findings of fact by the Arbitrator at an arbitration.

The arbitration process is generally similar to a Court proceeding, with both parties preparing evidence, presenting formal claims, statements of defence and submissions. Parties will also prepare and then present evidence at the arbitration hearing, usually in written form, and parties can cross-examine opposing witnesses. At the end of the hearing the Arbitrator will either issue the award immediately or send a written award to the parties some time after the arbitration hearing.

If you are considering arbitration, or think you may need to engage in compulsory arbitration as a result of COVID-19, the McCaw Lewis team can assist you with this process. Contact our Dispute Resolution Team for more information.

If you would like further information, please contact Daniel Shore on 07 958 7477.

Contact us

HAMILTON OFFICE

P. 07 838 2079

E. reception@mccawlewis.co.nz

Level 6, 586 Victoria Street
Hamilton 3204
New Zealand

TE KŪITI OFFICE

P. 07 878 8036

E. reception@mccawlewis.co.nz

36 Taupiri Street
Te Kūiti 3910
New Zealand