Preserving our history – Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014

The Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 (“HNZPTA”) is about the identification and preservation of our historic and cultural heritage and replaces the Historic Places Act 1993.  Under the HNZPTA the Historic Places Trust has been renamed Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga (“Heritage NZ”) to better reflect the Trust’s overall purpose.  This is to identify and protect all our cultural and heritage sites for the benefit and enjoyment of all New Zealanders for many years to come.

The changes to the HNZPTA are mainly focused on updating the old legislation and making the heritage consent application process faster and easier to follow.

In light of the Christchurch earthquakes of 2010 and 2011, the HNZPTA has also created an emergency archaeological authority to better manage the protection of our heritage and historic sites, and minimise any delays in decision-making when natural disasters occur.

What does the HNZPTA mean for property owners?

An archaeological site is defined in the HNZPTA as any place in New Zealand (including buildings, structures or shipwrecks) that was associated with pre-1900 human activity, where there is evidence relating to the history of New Zealand that can be investigated using archaeological methods.

When there is an archaeological site it is unlawful to modify or destroy the site without the consent of Heritage NZ.  This is the case even if:

  • The site is recorded by Heritage NZ or not; and
  • The land on which the site is located is:
    • Designated – which means the Council intends to use the land in the future for a particular work or project (i.e. building a road); or
    • The works to be undertaken are permitted under the District or Regional Plan; or
    • A resource or building consent has been granted for the works.

The HNZPTA provides that significant penalties can be imposed for unauthorised destruction or modification of such sites.

The term “modification” includes the following types of work:

  • Earthworks for forestry tracks, planting and harvesting;
  • Earthworks for residential developments, including building platforms, topsoil stripping and access ways;
  • Earthworks for stock races or farm tracks, fencing or landscaping;
  • Trenching for telephone, power, and waste disposal;
  • Road construction;
  • Quarrying; and
  • Building demolition.

If you are developing land and you come across anything on site during earthworks that may potentially be of heritage value, you must notify Heritage NZ and your local Council.  Any earthworks or construction that could affect the site must be stopped until Heritage NZ provides advice on how to proceed.

If you are concerned that your property may contain a heritage site, what should you do?
  • Contact Heritage NZ to see if your property is an historic site on the New Zealand Heritage List;
  • Contact your local Council, as a heritage site may be recorded in the Council’s property information file or LIM report; and
  • Check the title to the property, as Heritage NZ may have registered a heritage covenant or the Council may have registered a consent notice on the title to notify both current and future owners that the property contains a heritage site.

If your property does contain a heritage site that will be affected by any works/development you are planning, then you will need to apply to Heritage NZ for an authority to modify or destroy the site.  See this Heritage NZ webpage for information about obtaining an Archaeological Authority: http://www.heritage.org.nz/protecting-heritage/archaeology/archaeological-authorities

What is the New Zealand Heritage List?

The New Zealand Heritage List identifies New Zealand’s important historical and cultural heritage places and replaces the former Historic Places Register.  The aim of the list is to help better inform and notify owners, the public, community organisations, government agencies and Councils about significant heritage places.

The New Zealand Heritage List is divided into five parts:

  • Historic Places – such as archaeological sites, buildings and memorials;
  • Historic Areas – groups of related historic places, for example a geographical area with a number of properties or sites, a heritage precinct, or a historical and cultural area;
  • Wāhi Tūpuna – places important to Māori for their ancestral significance and associated cultural and traditional values;
  • Wāhi Tapu – places sacred to Māori in the traditional, spiritual, religious, ritual or mythological sense, such as maunga tapu, urupā, funeral sites and punawai; and
  • Wāhi Tapu Areas – areas that contain one or more wāhi tapu.
The role of local and territorial authorities

Councils, along with Heritage NZ, play an important monitoring role in the preservation and protection of heritage sites through District Plan policies and heritage listings under the Resource Management Act 1991.

Under the new Act, Heritage NZ must maintain, and supply Councils with, a list of all entries in the New Zealand Heritage List and heritage covenants that apply to their governing areas.  Councils, in turn, are required to make the list available for public inspection and should include heritage covenants and known heritage sites on the LIM reports for the affected properties.

How can we help?

The HNZPTA is an important piece of legislation that has changed the way heritage sites are managed in New Zealand.  If you require any further information about dealing with heritage sites or making an application to Heritage NZ please contact our Resource Management or Property teams.

If you would like further information please contact Dale Thomas on 07 958 7428.

Dying without a Will

Introduction

When a person dies without a Will, administration of the estate is more complicated than if the person had left one.  Dying without a Will is called “dying intestate”.  Due to the complex nature of dealing with an intestate estate, additional information is required throughout the process which can cause significant delays in administering the estate.  In many cases this will delay the distribution of the estate.

Letters of Administration

Where the deceased did not leave a Will (died intestate), the estate is small, there is no interest in land and there are no assets worth more than $15,000, the deceased’s next of kin is able to deal with the estate.  However, if the deceased died intestate and owned land or assets exceeding the value of $15,000 then Letters of Administration are required to administer the estate.

Letters of Administration is a similar process to an application for Probate (where the deceased left a Will), in that the administrators need to apply to the High Court to be appointed as administrators.  However, the Letters of Administration process takes much longer than the Probate process.  Firstly, it must be established that the deceased did not have a will and enquiries must be made to ascertain whether a deceased person has left a will.  The solicitor acting for the estate usually advertises in Law Talk (the leading New Zealand legal magazine).  The size of the estate must then be established to determine whether an application for Letters of Administration is required.

The Administration Act 1969 governs who may apply to be appointed as an administrator of an estate.  The High Court Rules specify the order of priority as to who can apply to be administrator(s). The descending priority is as follows:

  • The surviving spouse;
  • The children of the deceased;
  • The parent(s);
  • Brothers and sisters;
  • Grandparents;
  • Uncles and aunts.

Once it has been decided who is going to apply, consent must be obtained from those with an equal or greater right to apply.  For example, if the person did not have a spouse/partner but did have children, if one or more of them want to apply to be administrator(s) of the estate then all of the other children would need to consent to the application.

A Status of Children search will also need to be carried out by the Department of Internal Affairs and a certificate showing the results of the search must be attached to the application for Letters of Administration.

Once Letters of Administration has been granted by the High Court, the deceased’s estate will be administered in a similar way as with Probate.  However, as the deceased did not leave a Will, the Administration Act 1969 determines who is entitled to a share of the estate and the size of that share.

Distribution in accordance with the Administration Act 1969

Under the Administration Act 1969, an estate does not pass to the surviving spouse.  If there is a surviving spouse and surviving children, the spouse will inherit the first $155,000 of the estate, chattels and a third of the balance of estate.  Two thirds of the estate is inherited by the surviving children in equal shares.  Where there are no children, the spouse would receive the first $155,000 of the estate, chattels and two thirds of the residue.  The deceased’s parents would receive one third of the residue.  The Administration Act 1969 provides for every possible scenario in order to determine who is entitled to receive a share of an estate and the size of that share. In essence, where a person dies without a Will, the government decides how assets are to be divided between family members.

Letters of Administration with Will annexed

Letters of Administration with Will annexed are applied for where the deceased did leave a will but the executors named in that will either died before the deceased or are unwilling or unable to act as executors.  The Will is attached to the Letters of Administration application and once the administrator has been appointed by the High Court, he/she must administer the estate in accordance with the terms of the will.

Resealing of Letters of Administration grants in New Zealand

Dying without a Will where the deceased owned overseas assets can also be extremely complex and cause significant delay.  Letters of Administration must be granted in the country where the original Will is held.  The original copy of those Letters of Administration must then be filed in the High Court of New Zealand together with an application asking the High Court to reseal the grant of Letters of Administration.

The sealed Letters of Administration has the same force, effect and operation in New Zealand as if originally granted by the New Zealand High Court, and the administrator must perform the same duties and be subject to the same liabilities as if the grant had originally been made in New Zealand.   However, because the grant must first be obtained in another country, this creates delay in allowing the administrator to deal with the overseas assets owned by the deceased.

Conclusion

Dying without a Will can be a messy and costly business for those left behind.  The Administration Act 1969 determines who can apply for Letters of Administration to administer an estate and also how assets are to be divided between family members.  This may not be in accordance with the deceased’s wishes, which highlights the importance of having a Will in place to ensure a more simple way of giving effect to ones wishes.

If you would like further information please contact Amanda Hockley on 07 958 7451.

Contact us

HAMILTON OFFICE

P. 07 838 2079

E. reception@mccawlewis.co.nz

Level 6, 586 Victoria Street
Hamilton 3204
New Zealand

TE KŪITI OFFICE

P. 07 878 8036

E. reception@mccawlewis.co.nz

36 Taupiri Street
Te Kūiti 3910
New Zealand