Subsidiary Structuring for PSGEs – Limited Partnerships

As iwi move through their Waitangi Tribunal claims process to a settlement, the next question for many is how to manage settlement assets in the best interests of beneficiaries – both immediately and in the longer term. A post-settlement governance entity’s structure will depend on several factors, but there are few common vehicles that we see across the board which can be tailored to an iwi’s particular values and considerations. Limited partnerships are often set up to manage commercial activities.

Limited Partnerships v Companies

If a PSGE intends to take on any major particular commercial project or investment, either by itself or with third parties, we generally recommend that a new entity (i.e. separate from the PSGE) is established to protect the PSGE’s assets from any associated risk. These new entities generally fall under two types: companies or limited partnerships.  Companies are simpler structures and can be easier to set up; however they may be less advantageous from a tax perspective.

Under current tax law, entities deemed to be “Māori authorities” can take advantage of a lower income tax rate of 17.5% (compared to the corporate tax rate of 28%).  While PSGEs can benefit from this lower rate on income earned directly by the PSGE, a current “loophole” in the law means that a subsidiary company, even if it is wholly owned by a Māori authority, is not itself deemed to be a Māori authority and will consequently be taxed at the full corporate rate. As a result the PSGE may end up with unusable imputation credits on dividends.

However, limited partnerships tax income on a “flow-through basis”, whereby each limited partner gets taxed at its own rate on distributions of income earned by the partnership. For that reason, a limited partnership is usually the vehicle we will recommend to a PSGE looking to establish or expand its commercial activities.

This flow-through arrangement also makes limited partnerships an ideal vehicle for joint venture arrangements, where a PSGE partners with third parties (including private companies, charitable trusts or government entities) to undertake commercial activities – as each partner can be taxed at their own applicable rate.

Structure

A limited partnership is a separate legal entity, comprised of

  • A general partner, which can be an individual, a company or some other entity. The general partner is responsible for the day-to-day management of the partnership’s business. A general partner will often be set up as a new entity specifically to act in this capacity.
  • One or more limited partners. These are equivalent to a company’s shareholders, being the parties contributing capital and receiving distributions of income. The PSGE would be a limited partner, either alone or with joint venture parties.

Risk and Liability

In addition to their tax advantages, running commercial activities through a limited partnership also provides a level of protection for assets remaining in the PSGE trust from commercial risk via limited liability (similar to a traditional company). Unless assets are actually transferred to the ownership of the limited partnership, they are not part of the property of the limited partnership and will not be put at risk by the limited partnership’s activities.

However PSGEs using limited partnerships to manage risk do need to be vigilant to ensure they are not taking part in the management of the limited partnership – this must be done separately by the general partner. If the PSGE undertakes management activities itself, that limitation of liability is lost and the PSGE could end up bearing the responsibility for all of the limited partnership’s debts and liabilities.

Limited partnerships are a common vehicle used to help PSGEs best utilise their settlement assets for the benefit of iwi both short- and long-term. However the exact structure appropriate for your PSGE will depend on your particular values and considerations, and should be discussed with your lawyer in the first instance.

Jessica Middleton is a Senior Associate in our Commercial Team and can be contacted on 07 958 7436.

Charities Amendment Bill

The Charities Amendment Bill (the Bill) was introduced to Parliament on 21 September 2022.  The Bill is the result of a process to review and modernise the Charities Act 2005 (the Act) which began in 2018 and, like many things, experienced delays due to the COVID-19 pandemic.  The intention of the Bill is to increase transparency within the charities sector, improve access to justice services, and reduce the barriers faced by smaller charities.  Below, we set out some of the amendments proposed by the Bill.

  • The appeals framework is expanded to allow appeals against the decisions of the Charities Registration Board (or certain decisions of the Chief Executive) to be heard by the Taxation Review Authority (the Authority). It is intended that the Authority will be a faster, less formal, and cheaper avenue than the High Court.  The High Court would remain as an appeal court for the Authority’s decisions.  Charities would be able to represent themselves, further reducing legal costs, and the timeframe to lodge an appeal is increased from 20 working days to two months.  Appealable decisions are also expanded to include, among other things, all decisions of the Charities Registration Board.
  • The Chief Executive of the Department of Internal Affairs will be able to exempt ‘very small charities’ from meeting the current reporting standards. Exempt charities would still be required to provide an annual return with ‘minimum information’.  What constitutes a very small charity and minimum information will be defined by future, supplementary regulations.  This is a particularly welcome change as even the tier 4 reporting standards can be onerous in terms of time and cost for very small charities.
  • The roles and responsibilities of officers is also clarified within the Bill. The grounds for disqualification of officers are outlined and expanded on, and the Charities Registration Board is given the power to disqualify officers for serious wrongdoing or significant/consistent failures to meet their obligations.
  • One key change to be aware of is that the Bill would require charities to review their rules/governance procedures annually. Many charities may already undertake such reviews as a matter of good practice, however for smaller charities this may become a more onerous task.  This does present a timely reminder to charities to ensure that they are both following their rules and that their rules are fit for purpose.

Notably, amendments relating to the definition of charitable purposes or around political purposes are not considered by the Bill. The sector has been calling for a more thorough review for some time, and such a review is still intended to be undertaken in the future alongside additional non-legislative changes to improve the sector.  In the meantime, the Bill – if passed in its current form – does provide practical improvements to reporting requirements, appeals, governance, decision-making and compliance.

Public submissions are now open until 10 November 2022, and more information around making a submission can be found here Charities Amendment Bill – New Zealand Parliament (www.parliament.nz).  The Bill does not propose significant changes to the Charities Act 2005, therefore there is little required of charities while the Bill is in its early stages.  It will be worth reviewing the Bill as it progresses through Parliament to consider whether action is required at a later date.  The McCaw Lewis team can assist you in reviewing your charity’s rules and understanding what changes apply to your charity.

Kaylee is a Senior Solicitor in our Asset Planning Team and can be contacted on 07 808 6066.

Contact us

HAMILTON OFFICE

P. 07 838 2079

E. reception@mccawlewis.co.nz

Level 6, 586 Victoria Street
Hamilton 3204
New Zealand

TE KŪITI OFFICE

P. 07 878 8036

E. reception@mccawlewis.co.nz

36 Taupiri Street
Te Kūiti 3910
New Zealand